www.triusinc.com

Howard, people are just pointing out the fallacy in the various things you are posting. Just in case my previous post did not provide enough proof for you, here are a couple of additional sources, on the global damage (Well, US west coast) done by Fukushima. http://www.naturalnews.com/043271_starfi...

Howard, people are just pointing out the fallacy in the various things you are posting. Seriously? So, if *you* don't agree with something it's fallacy? How about this article from the respected Natural News source? http://www.naturalnews.com/043409_Fukushima_Cesium-137_radiation.html# And, what do...

I kind-of knew that most posters here would discount the report. Remember, that doesn't make the problem go away!

Take a look here. Though some deny that it is from Fukushima, others claim it is, and it makes sense that it is.

http://www.infowars.com/has-fukushimas- ... alifornia/

UNSCEAR reported that the Fukushima accident wasn't all that dangerous for the people. Well, here is a full critique of that report, for those who don't blindly believe UNSCEAR reports.

And the saga continues.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/for ... story.html

Well, you guys can pat each other on the back, but if you went to the presentation, or if you watched the video http://new.livestream.com/FukushimaLessons/boston#! you'd see for yourself that the presentations were excellent and VERY informative. Of course, I wouldn't expect you to agree with someth...

No, that is not _my_ conclusion. Read the attached, detailed report!

A very interesting article about Indian Point, following the conference by experts and ex-Prime Minister of Japan in NY. If anyone has information to counter the points they make, I'd like to hear them! Fukushima on the Hudson: Could a nuclear accident happen near NYC? http://america.aljazeera.com/a...

I don't want to get into silly arguments with them either. But. I still think that not commenting on such issues renders the posts worthless.

I just realized that I had a private message from the moderator (sent Sep 7, 2013) warning me not to post controversial messages in these forums. This is unbelievable. In the age of openness, the internet, freedom of expression, I can't post disagreeing with others in this forum? That's the last thi...

Really? So you don't like Gundersen, a well respected nuclear scientist and Jaczko, an ex- NRC Commissioner? Why, because their views are not tainted by the nuclear industry propaganda? And how about Naoto Kan, the former Japanese Prime Minister? You don't like him either? Take a look here: http://e...

Is anyone going to this panel discussion tomorrow? http://www.beyondnuclear.org/home/2013/10/7/for-those-in-new-york-and-boston-a-chance-to-hear-kan.html Apparently these well-known, nuclear knowledgeable people will be discussing what should be done post Fukushima. I wish I were closer, I wouldn't ...

Take a look at this. All valid points!

http://thetruthwins.com/archives/11-fac ... to-believe

Well, what a surprise! Let's just discount scientists whose findings don't agree with our beliefs. Can you substantively argue about any of the "specific" issues they raise? If so, please do, otherwise there is no need to post your silly arguments. I will shortly post some other links to o...