EVACUATION CRITERIA AFTER A NUCLEAR ACCIDENT

Messages about other areas of TRIUS expertise (Energy, Radiation Safety, Risk,..) and Technology, in general...
Post Reply
User avatar
PLeonat
Active User
Active User
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:48 pm

EVACUATION CRITERIA AFTER A NUCLEAR ACCIDENT

Post by PLeonat » Tue Aug 27, 2013 12:04 pm

Apparently, knee jerk evacuation may not be the best/safest thing to do following a nuclear accident!
Attachments
EVACUATION CRITERIA AFTER A NUCLEAR ACCIDENT - Personal Perspective.pdf
EVACUATION CRITERIA AFTER A NUCLEAR ACCIDENT:A PERSONAL PERSPECTIVE, Dr. Richard Wilson, Harvard University
(3.34 MiB) Downloaded 133 times

User avatar
JoseYun
New User
New User
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:13 pm

Re: EVACUATION CRITERIA AFTER A NUCLEAR ACCIDENT

Post by JoseYun » Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:28 pm

Pleonat, I'm glad you posted this, because I have been preaching for years that although sometimes needed, this immediate and indiscriminate evacuation following a nuclear accident can be a lot more damaging than helpful. I seem to recall the original emergency response plans, where the key-hole model was being used, i.e., evacuate only areas that may be in imminent exposure danger, based on current weather and plant conditions. Then we ended up with a 10 mile evacuation zone, instead of a 10 mile "response" zone. I wished more people who are knowledgeable on the subject, like Dr. Wilson, would speak up!

Post Reply