Low Radiation Still Harmfull

Messages about other areas of TRIUS expertise (Energy, Radiation Safety, Risk,..) and Technology, in general...
Post Reply
User avatar
HowardE
Frequent User
Frequent User
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:07 pm

Low Radiation Still Harmfull

Post by HowardE » Sat Jan 28, 2012 5:57 pm

I know that someone posted some report about low radiation not being too harmful, but there are other studies that concluded otherwise. Take a look at this one.
Attachments
Diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased chromosome translocations - evidence from three studies.pdf
(682.1 KiB) Downloaded 178 times
Anger is a good motivator!

User avatar
Helen22
Senior User
Senior User
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 6:59 pm

Re: Low Radiation Still Harmfull

Post by Helen22 » Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:26 am

HowardE wrote:I know that someone posted some report about low radiation not being too harmful, but there are other studies that concluded otherwise. Take a look at this one.
Hard to see how this report relates to the one about the new research on low levels of radiation! Also, remember that the end of the day, these are just reports. One needs to read them and try to draw their own conclusions.
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler" - A. Einstein

User avatar
HowardE
Frequent User
Frequent User
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:07 pm

Re: Low Radiation Still Harmfull

Post by HowardE » Thu May 03, 2012 3:20 pm

You may want to take a look at these reports, before you write off anything that doesn't fit your pre-conceived notions. Low Radiation doses may be MORE harmful.

http://enenews.com/epidemiology-scienti ... human-race


http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/ ... on-puzzle/

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-a ... 1d63z.html
Anger is a good motivator!

Post Reply